Corporate Supporter: Pryers Solicitors

“Pryers Solicitors are committed to helping people injured by negligent medical treatment and accidents. Established in York in 2002, we have since grown to be one of the largest medical negligence, personal injury and medical product liability firms in the North of England. Being based in York allows us to support our local community, but also act for injured clients across the whole of England & Wales.”

“As injury solicitors, we are all-to-familiar with the consequences of unsafe cycling conditions. Although we primarily deal with the consequences of poor driving, we understand how good infrastructure can keep cyclists safe. We support YCC in their work to make the roads around York safer, not just because of our experience helping people injured on local roads, but also because many of our staff and their families are keen cyclists so use these roads regularly, for commuting and leisure.”


@Pryers on Twitter
Pryers Solicitors LLP on Facebook

October 2021 Newsletter

Read about the triumph of September’s Kidical Mass ride which drew attention to the needs of younger cyclists. Save the date for our November AGM where we’ll learn lessons from Belgium on how to fashion a car-free city. And a bit of a breakthrough with the gate at the railway station…

Kidical Mass: Huge Success

Around 85 people turned out for York’s first ‘Kidical Mass’ cycle ride. We organised this family friendly mass cycle ride as part of York Environment Week to highlight the need for safe cycle routes to schools.  We featured on BBC Look North and all had a lovely time. We also wrote to the council. In response, Cllr Andy D’ Agorne, Executive member for Transport, declared his support for our event and added:

“While I would hope that the pilot ‘People Streets’ initiatives to promote walking and cycling to schools could be scaled up, you may note the proposed work on Ostman Rd near Carr Junior and Infants and the funding bid we have made to follow up the work already done by Sustrans at Clifton Green and Badger Hill Primary Schools. As part of the Local Transport Plan a Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan will be adopted which I would expect to include strategic links to provide safe cycling and walking to our schools across the city.”

Coming up: Disability cycle ride

We’re teaming up with EMpowered People to host our annual disabled cycle ride from York. Scheduled for Sunday 17th October, we’ll be doing a city cycle ride in the morning, and a countryside cycle ride in the afternoon. We warmly welcome disabled people to come and give cycling a go, do one or both of these rides, and to enjoy a supported cycle ride. We’ll also be needing able-bodied support riders so do get in touch if you think you might be able to help. For more details and to register for the ride please take a look at our Eventbrite page.

AGM: Ghentifying York?

Approach to St Nicholas Church in Ghent (CC BY-SA 4.0) Heraclitus2000/Wikicommons

On 3rd April 2017 the Belgian city of Ghent implemented a bold and controversial circulation plan, banning cars from the city centre, and limiting vehicle movement elsewhere. Overnight the city transformed and people had to re-think the way they moved around. In the three years after the circulation plan was put in place traffic accidents fell by a third, the number of cars dropped by one third, cycling increased by 60% and air quality improved significantly. Many people predicted that business would suffer, but in fact Ghent has seen a rise in start-ups and a decrease in vacant shops. And because the circulation plan simply repurposed existing roads, rather than building new infrastructure, it cost just €6 million to implement – approximately the same cost as building one mile of motorway. This short film illustrates how the circulation plan works.

York has much in common with Ghent, and like pre-2017 Ghent our city is choked by vehicle traffic every day. In December 2019 City of York Council passed a motion to ban non-essential car journeys into York’s city centre and reduce vehicle traffic across the rest of York by 2023. Could Ghentification be the solution to York’s traffic woes?  

Join us to hear Filip Watteeuw, Deputy Mayor of Ghent and instigator of the circulation plan. He’ll explain what motivated him to carry out such an audacious change, the opposition he faced, and how the city has fared since the plan has been in place.

We’ll be beaming Filip in at 7pm on Wednesday 24th November, to a live audience at Cycle Heaven. Tickets will be available soon. Save the date! 

Rail station gate closing time

We’ve got some good news to report about the gate between Scarborough Bridge and the short stay car park for the Rail Station. After productive discussions with representatives from LNER and the Transport Police, the station manager has agreed to trial leaving the gate open until midnight (currently it is locked at 11pm), and to collect data to see whether the route is well used, and monitor any problems. We’ll let you know as soon as the trial is set to begin.

Help redesign York Central

Community group YoCo are inviting people to help redesign York Central, using a public engagement tool to crowdsource a community plan. Cycle Campaign members are warmly invited to get their town-planning hats on and help to redesign the movement aspects of this major development, using this link to get your ticket

Tadcaster Road proposals: read our response

The consultation period has closed and we have submitted our response outlining the many reasons for our dissatisfaction with the plans. 

Navigation Road Trial

Navigation Road LTN Proposal (image c/o COYC)

After many years of campaigning for this road to be closed to through traffic we’re pleased to see that the council are trialling a Low Traffic Neighbourhood with segregated cycle routes running in both directions – hurrah! Please note that the road will be closed for 5 days from 4th October, but that pedestrian access will be maintained. The council tells us that cyclists will be asked to dismount, but that there will be staff ready to assist anyone who needs additional help.

Once works are complete and the road opened it will no longer be possible for motor traffic to use Navigation Road as a through-road heading north, but they will be able to head south. Cyclists and pedestrians will be able to use the road in both directions as before, as will traffic accessing the residential properties in the area. The trial will remain in place in this form for six months, before a decision is made by the Executive for Transport. If you’d like to submit your comments on how you’re finding the new arrangement you can email

York Outer Ring Road Dualling plans

The cycle campaign spoke at the Executive meeting last Thursday (30 September) on plans to dual the Outer Ring Road, a video of the meeting and summary of our statement can be found on our website.

Cycle marking at York Rail Station

The Cycle Campaign is teaming up with the British Transport Police to conduct a couple of Bike Register events (using UV permanent ink) at York Rail Station in October and November. As soon as the dates are confirmed we’ll let you know, and if anyone can volunteer on the day to help with the marking and to promote the Cycle Campaign then please get in touch! Don’t forget you can still log your bike without having it marked by the police through the Bike Register website.

And in other news…

This month we’ve also:

  • written to Andy Kerr raising our concerns about the proposed design for Piccadilly
  • questioned the council’s capability to deliver its promises on Active Travel schemes. 
  • assisted the Civic Trust Transport Group to monitor the impact of the closure of Bootham and Gillygate (many thanks to all the Cycle Campaign volunteers who went out with clipboards and did traffic counts!)


Road margin repairs

Greg Morgan (the council’s Active Travel officer) is drawing up a list of roads to be get margin repairs (resurfacing the metre nearest the kerb) and needs our help to prioritise the cycle routes in most urgent need. Please email him with your requests!

Ward Reps

We’re still looking for members who might be willing to be cycle campaign representatives for city council wards across York. It could the ward you live in, the ward you work in, or the ward you regularly cycle through! We’d like to try and have representatives covering every ward in the city, helping us keep an eye on planning applications within their ward and maintaining a link with ward councillors. Could this be you? 

If you’re interested please let us know by registering your ward on the member’s hub.

Cycling UK Discount

As a member of the Cycle Campaign, you can get discounted affiliate membership of Cycling UK (benefits include £10m third party liability insurance, retailer discounts and discounts on Cycling UK training courses). Details on how to claim your discount can be found in your welcome pack on joining the Campaign.

Terry Avenue

Please continue to report any problems you spot to community liaison officer Aimee Ramsden ( or on-site). Also copy in the Environment Agency (, York Cycle Campaign ( and if it is a breach of planning conditions then please report it to the Planning Enforcement team (

A1237 Dualling Statement

CoYC’s September Executive meeting discussed the dualling of the A1237 (Northern Ring Road) between Clifton Moor and Hopgrove Roundabout. Last year we looked at these proposals and what they meant for cycling, so committee member Andy went to the meeting to reiterate the Campaign’s concerns about the cycling provision along the route.

YCC Committee member Andy speaks on behalf of the Campaign at the Executive meeting

A summary of the point’s we made are;

  • As a campaign we remain neutral on the existence of the outer ring road, but would like to highlight that all the evidence demonstrates that building this road will only bring short-term relief and ultimately lead to more cars and more congestion. This much was admitted to me by a senior York transport officer in recent years.
  • Nevertheless, officers do state that they anticipate that this scheme will redistribute traffic around the city and reduce its impact within York’s urban areas. However, anticipation alone will not be enough.
  • We believe that the increase in motor traffic (25% in the last decade) is largely responsible for the massive drop in cycling in York in recent years. If cycling is to increase again, then motor traffic in York’s urban areas must be reduced.   
  • IF Exec members decide to approve this scheme, then the cycle campaign proposes that they lock in its potential benefits by committing to measures that will genuinely reduce cross-city car journeys AND increase active travel. 
  • The Belgian city of Ghent, which shares many similarities with York, has led the way in this respect, introducing a very successful traffic circulation plan which prevents cross-city journeys and redirects drivers around the ring road.  
  • The Cycle Campaign have invited the Ghent’s Deputy Mayor to talk about this plan. The event will be on 24th November at 7pm and we warmly invite Executive members and transport officers to attend. 
  • Regarding the design of the road itself, we welcome the improvements that will make it safer and easier for people travelling by cycle or on foot. However, there are still some areas that need further work.
  • Once the ring road is dualled it will become too dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists to cross it unsupported – we ask that supported crossings or underpasses should be provided as a minimum at all ring road crossing points.
  • In particular we ask that improvements are made at the following locations:
    • At Wiggington Road roundabout, providing supported crossings or an underpass. 
    • Reconsider the layout of the walk/cycle path at Shipton Road, which currently proposes a badly angled underpass with hairpin bends. The design should accommodate the design vehicle as specified in LTN1/20. 
    • Provision of walk/cycle access to the new Clifton Moor estate.
    • A supported crossing at Monks Cross.
    • … and lighting to illuminate all the walk/cycle paths, not just the road.
  • It’s not good enough to say that the money has run out and that additional walk/cycle improvements cannot be made now. York’s transport hierarchy puts pedestrians and cyclists above vehicles, so therefore, safe, direct and accessible walk/cycle routes must take priority over improvements for motorists.
  • We ask that the Exec request a feasibility study into adopting the Ghent model as a condition of approving this scheme.
  • And finally we ask the Exec to ensure that all walk/cycle crossings of the newly dualled ring road are supported or that underpasses are installed.   

Tadcaster Road Consultation Response

During September 2021, City of York Council and West Yorkshire Combined Authority (WYCA) consulted on design for changes for Tadcaster Road that aim to improve active travel and public transport along the key route in and out of the city.

Earlier in the month we shared our first impressions of the design, below we share our formal response that was submitted to the consultation in which we assess the designs against LTN 1/20 – the current guidance on providing cycle infrastructure produced by the Department of Transport.

The Core Design Principles 

Section 1.5 of LTN 1/20 sets out that cycle infrastructure should be Coherent; Direct; Safe; Comfortable and Attractive.


The scheme is not coherent in that there are poor connections to major attractors such as York College, Tescos, and NCN 665/65 at the Southern end and the City centre through Micklegate bar, the railway station and All Saints school at the Northern end.. There are unintuitive sections at the approach to the crossing at York College with a cycle lane inbound next to a cycle track outbound . 


The route along Tadcaster road is fairly direct but rather longer at the Moor Lane roundabout which requires many stops to get around the roundabout on the much longer cycle tracks with frequent stops at signalled crossings. Outbound cyclists need to give way on The Mount on three occasions compared to using the road. Priority should be given to cyclists at all side road accesses in line with LTN 1/20. 


No protected on-carriageway cycle lanes are shown on the proposals and the road will not feel safer than it does at present with slightly wider painted advisory and mandatory cycle lanes along it. Inbound along the Mount, where the bus lane is shortened, no cycle lane is proposed at two junctions which will lead to cyclists getting cut up by left turning traffic especially at Driffield Terrace.. 

Cycle lanes widths of 1.7m, 1.8m and 2.0m are shown on three cross sections of route sent to YCC at our request. 1.7m and 1.8m lanes are above the 1.5m minimum width in LTN 1/20 but below the desired minimum width of 2.0m. To understand and assess the proposals properly more cross sections should be provided showing cycle and traffic lane widths along the whole route. 

Table 5-2 from LTN 1/20

The proposed conversion of the separated paths to a shared path along the Knavesmire will lead to unnecessary conflict with pedestrians. Separate paths should be retained and there is room to widen them both from the existing 3.0m separated wide path to 4.5m as recommended. 

Junction treatments seem to be refreshing what is already in place. Very little new is planned at the Moor lane Roundabout with inbound cycle lane leading into the Roundabout with no cycle facilities on it and the transition from cycle path inbound from Moor lane onto Tadcaster Rd is dangerous with a narrow cycle lane sandwiched between a bus lay by and moving traffic. For Traffic signals ASL are retained which LTN 1/20 says are the least effective measure for cyclists and will not improve the perception of safety. More effective safety measures which separate cyclists in time and space such as hold the left turn, two stage right turns, low level signals with early release and signal bypasses at T junctions do not seem to have been considered


The new road surface is comfortable to use although it was dug up fairly soon after being resurfaced by Northern Gas. The widths of the proposed lanes are mainly below the desirable minimum in LTN 1/20 and the widths of shared paths at the minimum. Stopping and starting at Moor Lane Roundabout and outbound on the cycle track along the Mount can be reduced through priority crossings. 


LTN 1/20 also has a useful table showing the sort of cycle protection that is needed with different traffic flows and speed limits. 

A table extracted from LTN 1/20 which shows appropriate types of infrastructure for different speeds. At 30mph with 6000+ PCU per day protected space is acceptable, whilst cycle lanes are only acceptable for some if any
Figure 4.1 from LTN 1/20

Tadcaster Road has 16,000 passenger car units (PCU)/24 hours and is 30mph so the proposal of cycle lanes will exclude some/most potential users. In order to make the route attractive the guidance recommends that some form of protected space is provided, whether through kerb or light segregation, any of which would massively improve the attractiveness to all user groups.


LTN 1/20 is clear that an overarching principle of the above five principles is inclusive and accessible design. A route should be accessible for all types of cyclists and cycles. A design bike 2.75m long and 1.2m wide is suggested in LTN 1/20 to cover the range of cycles that will use a route and inform the design of lane and crossings. This size of bike would have trouble navigating the staggered signalled crossings at the Moor Lane roundabout and getting access to the NCN 665 entrance/exit at the Sim Balk Lane junction. 

Assessment Tools

LTN 1/20 has two tools to review existing schemes and new proposals against the principles of LTN 1/20. It is not apparent from the consultation documents if these have been undertaken for the proposals, as no scores for the scheme have been provided or referred to. In lieu of such information, York Cycle Campaign has undertaken a review of the proposals using the information available.

Cycling Level of Service Tool (CLoS)

Reviews the whole route and uses the 5 core principles above to score a route on 25 indicators. Each indicator is scored from 0 to 2 where 0 means only experienced cyclists could use the facility e.g. an advisory cycle lane, while a score of 2 means anyone wishing to cycle could use it e.g. a protected bike lane of adequate width. .

YCC has scored the Tadcaster Rd route using CLoS and it scores 25 out of 50 points so 50%. The threshold for a route to receive funding from the DfT is 70%.

A completed copy of the CLoS is attached in Appendix A.

Junction Assessment Tool (JAT)

We have also carried out assessments on two signalled junctions. Sim Balk Lane scored 8 out of 40 as some of the movements can be made on cycle paths. St Helens Rd signals scored 0 out of 12 as all of the 6 movements made by bike are made with moving traffic and the right turn into St Helens Road requires crossing a moving traffic lane. 

We recommend that CYC/WYCA carry out or commission an independent CLoS and JAT to review the existing proposals and make recommendations to improve the scheme. These results should be published. 

A completed copy of the JATs is attached in Appendix B & C. 

‘Section A0’: Holgate Road to Micklegate Bar

Whilst not specifically covered in the proposals, we feel that the section from the end of the proposals to Micklegate Bar is a key link in the success of any scheme and is currently being overlooked.

This is a crucial link to the city centre, station and All Saints school and there are five traffic lanes at the junction of Blossom Street with Micklegate with no cycle facilities. Road works to Micklegate Bar in the recent past have taken out the middle inbound lane without seemingly causing traffic chaos.

Protected bike lanes are desperately needed along this section and could easily be provided through the freeing up of that same inbound lane. This would encourage children to cycle to school safely, link in with the protected lanes proposed as part of ‘York Station Front’ scheme, and provide cyclists a safe link to the city centre. 

Section A1: Tadcaster Road/Dalton Terrace

Nothing is proposed for correcting the priorities of the cycle path over side roads between Scarcroft Road and Ablemarle. This opportunity was missed when the path was revised a few years ago, but LTN 1/20 is quite clear that cycle paths should be given priority over side roads in paragraph 10.5.7 and figure 10.13. There is no clear reason why this hasn’t or can’t be included within this scheme.

A collection of diagrams from LTN 1/20 which show various ways a cycle lane can be taken across a side road junction maintaining priority over the side road
Figure 10.13 from LTN 1/20

At the junction with Scarcroft Road inbound cycles could be provided with a straight on green signal to bypass traffic signals and be given priority. For cyclists turning right turn onto Scarcroft Road an ASL is proposed which is the least effective measure at signals according to LTN 1/20. Instead a two stage right turn system could be made possible by allocating some of the cobbled area. For outbound cyclists the advanced cycle stop line and low level signals good start are beneficial, but could be further improved with an early release light and protection to the cycle lane. 

At the junction of Dalton Terrace & Albemarle Rd, the inbound cycle lane requires protection and has a ASL proposed without a feeder cycle lane. As previously stated, the ASL is the least effective measure for cyclists at traffic signals – a hold left turn, two stage right turn, or early release would all remove safety for cyclists at this junction.

Section A2: Tadcaster Road/Knavesmire Road

Widening the cycle lanes in both directions by removing the right-hand turn pocket at St Aubyns Place, the splitter islands and revising the bus lane.

Agree but need to see details of cycle lane and traffic lane widths and cycle lanes require protection.

Revising the bus lanes – these are shortened on the approaches to the junctions at St Aubyns Place and Driffield Terrace and no cycle lanes are shown on the approach or across the junction – this will mean cyclists are in conflict with left turning traffic with no protection. 

Relocating the Knavesmire Grasslands fence to provide 3m of shared space

Whilst we agree with the increase in path, LTN 1/20 and Gear Change are clear that shared space should be avoided unless the alternative is cyclists having to use road space. In this case we question whether the path can be widened any further to allow a clearly designated separation between uses.

No improvements appear to be proposed to the slipway onto this path from the main carriageway. There are also no openings along it’s route to facilitate joining/exiting the path – of particular use to those living/visiting the houses opposite. The transition back onto the road at the Hob Moor crossing point is not gradual and is not clear to drivers. 

There is an opportunity to extend the existing separate paths up to the Marriott Hotel. Pedestrian and cycling areas should be clearly designated as such to avoid conflict, as advised in LTN 1/20 though a protected cycle lane along the road is preferable where funds are available.

Section A3: Pulleyn Drive

Outbound – no cycle lane shown from just before Pulleyn drive southbound and plan does not appear to show shared use of sufficient width – plenty of room to move fence alongside Knavesmire and provide wider separate paths for cyclists and people walking. 

Converting the existing off road cycle lane and pedestrian facilities next to the Knavesmire to shared use space

This could create conflict between cyclists and pedestrians. The current separation of these users should be further enhanced by widening the complete path to the recommended width of 4.5m and remarking designated areas. Dropped kerb entrance points are also required to allow cyclists to enter this long stretch of traffic-protected route from smaller roads on the opposite side of Tadcaster Road as well as make right turns into them rather than try to do this turn between two lanes of traffic.

Section A4: Nelson’s Lane

Constructing a signal controlled crossing between Nelsons Lane and Chalfonts

Creating this crossing as a Toucan type crossing would also allow northbound cyclists to access the fully segregated path on the southern side of the road with greater ease and safety.

Section A5: Ainsty Grove to St Helens Road

Widening the road near Ainsty Grove to provide space for a wider pedestrian and cycle refuge

We feel that a better improvement for both cyclists and pedestrians would be to replace the refuge with a Zebra crossing with parallel cycle crossing, as has been installed along Heslington Lane to link University sports pitches.

Removing one of the pedestrian refuges near Mayfield Grove and widening the remaining one

Provision of a parallel crossing at the remaining crossing would provide safer crossing of inbound cyclists onto the shared path on the opposite side of the road. Signalising this crossing or providing a zebra would greatly increase safety and convenience for both pedestrians and cyclists. 

Providing a specialist traffic light signal button to allow people on bikes to request an earlier start.

This is not an appropriate addition. Including a button means that the lights would work differently to all other early release lights in the city. It also has huge potential to discriminate against cyclists that don’t have the ability to manoeuvre themselves into the position required to reach and press the button such as riders on tricycles, recumbents, cargo bikes, or with trailers. This in turn will mean that they are excluded from the safety benefits of having an early release. Instead automatic detection of cyclists should be used; as is already used across the city and is proposed for buses at this very junction. 

YCC have carried out a Junction Assessment for this junction and it scored 0 out of a possible 12 points as none of the cycle movements at it were protected in time or space. See Appendix B.

Section A6: Slingsby Shops

Adding a section of off-road cycle track so that people on bikes travelling inbound (towards the city centre) can by-pass the parking and bus stop.

We welcome the proposal of a bus stop by-pass as a good idea, but it should also apply inbound by the shops and Dringhouses library where the cycle lane is shown outside of the parking bays which is not good practice 

Section A8: Moor Lane roundabout

Proposal is a replication of the existing, with no ambition for improvement. Consider a whole redesign towards a Dutch style with more direct routes, that are closer to the apex of the corner with priority over each arm with zebra crossing.

Segregated route/footpath swaps side depending on the arm of the roundabout and there is a lot of wasted space at the roundabout with anti pedestrian cobbles which are a trip hazard

Accessibility audit for the roundabout done, compliance with Equalities Act 2010.

The only change at the roundabout is moving some guardrail which will narrow the footway and cycle track. This roundabout was designed in the 1980’s as part of the Tescos development and needs full review and redesign with options to either signal using CYCLOPs principles or convert to a Dutch Style roundabout with single lane entry, perpendicular entries to slow traffic and a annular cycle track with priority crossing for people walking and cycling across each arm. 

Figure 10.37 from LTN 1/20 showing a roundabout with outlying one-way cycle track and crossings 

Section A9: York College

The proposals don’t appear to provide any improvements to the connection with the NCN 655 Solar System route to Bishopthorpe and Copmanthorpe. We believe there is opportunity here for some consideration to be given to the existing spiral access to NCN 665 and either improve gradients to standards in LTN 1/20. Alternatively assessing other access points such as a crossing on Sim Balk Lane signals to link with the new ramp down to NCN 665, a route which is currently rough trod by students and others down the side of the A64 bridge, or using existing track opposite York College to the new sports pavilion. 

A better entrance to NCN 655 and P&R could be made by moving vehicle restraint barriers to the road’s edge on the currently cobbled area, allowing a widening of the entry path. This should be combined with lowering and reducing the hedges by entrance to improve visibility. 

YCC have carried out a draft Junction Assessment of the Sim Balk lane junction using the JAT tool in LTN 1//20 Appendix B, scoring only 8 points out of a posible 40. A copy of our evaluation is included in Appendix C.

Crossing of the road for pedestrians and cyclists could also be significantly improved with the introduction of a 20mph zone, and supporting speed calming features, along the frontage of York college in line with the city’s policy of 20mph outside education establishments with speed table at existing toucan crossing and consider converting to parallel crossing. 

Adding an dedicated off road cycle track so that people on bikes travelling outbound (towards York City ) can by-pass the bus stop. This facility would require the removal of trees.

The proposed layouts south of the junction of an inbound lane/outbound track next to each other but in mirrored directions to what is conventional on UK roads is unclear and potentially hazardous.

We also foresee a conflict of use from pedestrians coming from/leaving the college walking along the proposed cycle track conversion to the bus stop. A more appropriate move would be to make the existing shared use path by Tescos wider to enable separate paths for people walking and cycling as it provides a bus stop bypass already, and replacing the bus cage with a bus layby.

Widening the shared use pavement on both sides of the road after York College to the junction to 3m

No proposals are apparent for dealing with the blind corner on the junction with Sim Balk Lane alongside the burial ground. There is the potential to rake back the retaining wall on the corner to improve visibility for both pedestrians and cyclists.

‘Section A10’: Beyond York College

The section of Tadcaster Road beyond York College is not covered in the consultation documents, however it was included in the scoping map available from CoYC.

We feel that the entrance into P&R the route should be realigned to follow the desire line across the entry and exit lanes; this desire line is well formed and clearly evident on site and significantly shortens the journey of both pedestrians and cyclists.

Comments on the Consultation Process

The level of information provided in the technical drawings fluctuates highly, in places simple matters such as lane widths are lacking but in other areas are highly refined such as the movement of guardrails by the millimeter. All the information provided is highly technical in its presentation, relying on any observer to have the ability to read and comprehend street plans in order to make an informed decision. If members of the public are to be involved it should be in a way that is inclusive of all such as demonstrative sections showing the proposed widths, CGIs of key parts of the route or proposals, and precedent images of similar interventions locally or nationally.

It is unclear if the priorities outlined in the consultation webpage are correct. They are not aligned with climate change act obligations to reduce over GHG emissions, and DoT stated objectives for making space for active travel. The focus appears to be reducing (car) traffic congestion to achieve air quality improvements. 

Whilst there has been efforts made to promote the consultation on social media, the Campaign is not aware of any publicity being made along the route itself to actual users of the route – especially those that might not have access to social media channels.

No information has been provided on current cycling, walking and motor traffic usage levels, Road traffic casualties, air quality or traffic speeds along Tadcaster Rd. Most of this information is publicly available on various web sites eg. Bike Data. It is also needed for making the case for the scheme and for monitoring the effectiveness of the measures. For example; how is air quality – one of the stated aims of the scheme – to be monitored? How many people cycle along Tadcaster Road now and what is the trend? What is the business case for the scheme and the main benefits?

We are also disappointed that York Cycle Campaign (and other cycle user groups) hasn’t been consulted directly and offered an opportunity to meet with the design team – stakeholder engagement such as with local campaign groups being recommended during the design process within LTN itself.

Kidical Mass Letter

Ahead of our Kidical Mass event we sent the below letter to the council to explain why we were holding the ride, and what cycling could mean for York’s children.

Dear City of York Council,

On Sunday 19 September 2021, as part of York Environment Week, York Cycle Campaign is organising a family-friendly Kidical Mass event. We had originally intended that the ride should pass the Minster but the lack of safe cycling infrastructure on routes leading to the city centre, and the absence of a cycle-friendly route through the city centre means that we could not ensure the safety of participants. As a consequence, we have had to choose an alternative itinerary through the University campus. This highlights the fact that cycling in York is all too often dangerous and difficult, particularly for inexperienced and vulnerable road-users such as children.

York Cycle Campaign believes that cycling can play a vital role in: 

  • safeguarding the physical health of York’s children: cycling can reduce the risk of obesity and associated long term chronic illness such as diabetes. An increase in cycling will decrease air-borne pollution from traffic and reduce asthma and related health complications   
  • boosting the well-being of York’s children: cycling improves mental health and promotes independence, enabling children from walks of life to travel cheaply and independently to school and for leisure 
  • promoting the long-term survival of York’s children: helping York to meet its carbon-neutral commitment and address the climate crisis which poses a critical threat to future generations.  

The Campaign therefore calls upon the Council to take action to ensure that cycling in York is safe, convenient and accessible for York’s children and their parents and carers. Promotion activities (e.g. Bike to School Week) and training (e.g. Bikeability) are welcome but these fail York’s children in the absence of safe cycling infrastructure. 

The Campaign therefore asks the Council to:

  1. produce a  Local Transport Plan and Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (CWIP Local which meet the expectations of the Government’s vision for cycling and walking (Gear Change) and its guidance (LTN 1/20) on cycle provision, which emphasises the need for high quality, segregated cycle paths;
  2. ensure that all developments and re-developments in York provide cycling infrastructure to LTN 1/20 standards;  
  3. fast track improvements to cycling infrastructure, to LTN 1/20 standards, on key routes to York’s nurseries, primary and secondary schools;
  4. introduce ‘school streets’, temporary restrictions on motorised traffic outside schools at drop-off and pick-up times.   

We look forward to your response and hope to be able to work with City of York Council on the actions we ask for.

Yours sincerely,

York Cycle Campaign